Innovation and technical efficiency in Malaysian family manufacturing industries
Keywords:Data Envelopment Analysis, technical efficiency, innovation and balanced scorecard.
AbstractThis study investigates the technical efficiency for each industry in the Malaysian manufacturing sector is estimated by using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). In order to pursue a balance of innovation between long-term and short-term performance strategy, we integrate the Balance Scorecard (BSC) approach with DEA. Furthermore, this paper looks at the determinants of efficiency using the Tobit regression model. In measuring the level of firms’ efficiency and innovation, the wood and wood based products industry is emphasized due to its importance in the economic growth of manufacturing sector. In the wood and wood based products industry, the highest level of technical efficiency was achieved by two sub-sectors i.e. veneer sheets and plywood and laminboard, particle board and other panels board, with the mean value of technical efficiency of 1.081 and 1.097 respectively. Generally, the majority of the manufacturing firms are operating technical inefficiently. The distribution of DEA and DEA-BCS technical efficiency in Malaysian Manufacturing Industries show that most of the industries have the average technical efficiency scores greater than 1.05 with only 7 industries (13.21%) in DEA-BSC model operating at or near to the most optimal productions.
Arrow, K. (1977). The organization of economic activity: Issues pertinent to the choice of market versus nonmarket allocations. In Public Expenditure and Policy Analysis, ed. R. H. Haveman and J. Margolis, pp. 67-81. Rand McNally, Chicago.
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., (Sept. 1984)“Some model for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiency in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 9,. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Banker, R.D., (1984) “Estimating Most Productive Scale Size using Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 17, pp. 35-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(84)90006-7
Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G. and Thanassoulis, E. (1991), “Applied data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 52 No. 1, pp. 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(91)90331-O
Caves, R.E. (1992), Industrial efficiency in Six Nations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., and Rhodes, E. (1978) “Measuring the efficiency of Decision-Making Unit.” European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444.
Chen, C.-J. and Yeh, Q.-J. (2005), “A comparative performance evaluation of Taiwan’s high-tech industries”, International Journal of Business Performance Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 444-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJBPM.2005.007369
Chow, C. W. Haddad, K. M., and Williamson, J. E. (1997), “Appling the balanced scorecard to small companies”, Management Accounting (August), 21-27.
Danlin, V.I., Materov, I.S., rosefield, S., & Lovell, C.A.K. (2001), “Measuring enterprise efficiency in the Soviet Union: A stochastic frontier analysis. Economics, 52, 225-233.
Farrell, M. J. (1957) “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) 120(3), 253–290. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2343100
Fethi, M. D., (2000), “Measuring the efficiency of European airlines: an application of DEA and Tobit Analysis”, EPRU Discussion Papers, Efficiency and Productivity Research Unit, University of Leicester.
Freel, M. S. (2000). Do small innovating firms outperform non-innovators? Small Business Economics, 14(3), 195-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266
Jackson, P. M. (1999), “Productivity and Performance of Public Sector Organizations”, International Journal of Technology Vol.17. No.7/8, 753-766.
Jain, R. (2010). Innovation in Organizations: A Comprehensive Conceptual Framework for Future Research. [Article]. South Asian Journal of Management, 17(2), 81-111.
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992), The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 70 No. 1, pp. 71-9.
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Kerstens, K. (1996), “Technical efficiency measurement and explanation of French urban transit companies”, Transportation Research – A 30, 6, 431-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0965-8564(96)00006-7
Ministry of International Trade and Industry (2008), “Launch of New Initiatives between German-Malaysian Institute (GMI) and Industry Partners - Taman Shamelin Perkasa (14 Mac 2007)”, Retrieved on March 23, 2009 from <http://portaluat.miti.gov.my/cms/contentPrint.jsp?id=com.tms.cms.article.Article_9bd57e41 -c0a81573-aba0aba0-58da9b93&paging=0>
Mohd N. Z. and Ismail, R. (2004), Analisis kecekapan teknik dalam industry skel kecil dan serdahana di Malaysia. In the Proceeding Seminar Kebangsaan Daya Saing Ekonomi dan Sosial Ke arah Pemantapan Pembangunan Ekonomi, Port Dickson, Malaysia.
Oum, T.H. and Yue, C. (1994), “Economic efficiency of railways and implications for public policy: a comparative of the OECD countries’ Railways”, Journal of transport Economics and Policy 28, 2, 121-138.
Rahmah I., and Noorasiah S., (2007), “Technical efficiency in Malay Manufacturing Firms, International Journal of Business and Society, Jul 2007; 8, 2; ABI/INFORM Global pg. 47.
Third Industrial Master Plan, 2006 – 2020
Tobin, J. (1958), “Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables”, Econometrica 26, 24-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1907382
Wright, W. F., Smith, R., Jesser, R., & Stupeck, M. (1999). “Information technology, process reengineering and performance measurement: A Balanced Scorecard analysis of Compaq Computer Corporation”, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, I. Retrieved May 12, 2004, form <http://fag.hia.no/kurs/is4400/artickler/wright_etal.htm>
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after official publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).